Director of the Securities Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, against hedge fund advisors manipulating their performance indicators to better reflect on results. Speaking at a CFA Institute conference, the organisation’s quantitative analytics unit had uncovered evidence that as many as 13 funds had been assigning their trades to favoured clients, a practice otherwise known as ‘cherry picking’.
“We plotted the accounts that were allocated winning trades more often than losing trades. And we came out of that and found 13 hedge funds that had accounts that were being disproportionately allocated favourable trades,” he said. However, the agency official went on to stress that the investigation was yet to uncover conclusive evidence of misconduct: “I’m not saying it is a pinpoint but from an examination standpoint we’re zeroing in on issues that raise the spectre of improper conduct.”
The findings come as the SEC closes out a two-year examination of recently registered hedge funds, all of which are managing over $100m in assets and have agreed to comply with the SEC’s regulatory framework, which strictly prohibits cherry picking.
Bowden’s announcement also comes hot on the heels of the regulator’s decision in August to broaden its investigation into how the ‘liquid alternative’ sector operates, after .
The agency has, in the last four years, ramped up its efforts to uncover instances of non-compliance amongst fund advisors, and while the investigations have uncovered a long list of deficiencies, many of them are due to the complexity of new regulatory requirements. The 2010 Dodd-Frank overhaul and the SEC’s investigations combined mean that a hedge fund industry that has, historically speaking, been subject to loose touch oversight is now beginning to feel the pinch of sharpened regulatory scrutiny.